Skip to main content

Why Waste Time Reading Content That Hurts More Than Helps

Three ways B2B marketers can … BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH

Why waste your time reading content that is boring, repetitive, wrong or just plain trash?

What is going on with the acceptance of mediocrity and the drivel that is being passed around by marketing bloggers? How are some of these people even employed or making a living? The garbage that is written and being passed off as valuable content is just ridiculous.  
I can’t believe what the industry is accepting as decent content. Just how bad has the marketing blogosphere become? In MHO the industry is almost at rock bottom.
Our industry is under attack from within. As proof, I offer that I read 3 really poorly constructed blogs today where no one even commented, but many of them were shared. Actually as an avid reader looking to grow and learn I am offended by much of the bunkum that is being offered.
To prove my point, I will dissect the most recent industry article, that I read today. Note, it was shared 216 times. There were no comments, good or bad. The post broke SEO best practices and was poorly constructed. I would have expected readers to comment.  I believe that it most likely wasn’t shared externally from the author's employer.
You can decide if I am full of it, a nut or perhaps, just maybe, I am correct.

HLED Three ways B2B marketers can drive more traffic to their sites.”  A Good headline that caught my attention.

This article was in my Zest feed, so it supposedly was vetted by professionals, right?  I thought so, causing me to read on.  
I read the H2, which was: “Advice for B2B marketers often focuses on how to optimise the company website. Specifically, marketers should state what problems the B2B company solves, deliver high-quality content, and include a clear call-to-action”.  
Does anyone besides me see this multiple points H2 goes against SEO best practices?  I was taught the H2 is not for multiple sentences or thoughts.
The wording of the H2 reads like a train wreck. “Advice for B2B marketers often focuses on how to optimise the company website.”  WOW, so inciteful to us marketers!  
Is the intended audience of this article people that have no concept of best practices?  Are they “marketeers” or are they presumed to be frauds that don’t know squat! Now that is an interesting a target audience!
This article offends my senses so badly that I am guessing that this article or post was being written because it was on the content calendar and there was nobody else available to handle the assignment.  
I did wonder if the writer that received the assignment was in Colorado, or some other marijuana approved locale when it was written. Or maybe the sentence is constructed so poorly that the company website mentioned is actually the marketer’s client’s website?   
I wasn’t sure (even now) what the writer was trying to say, but rather than bounce, I decided to read on to see how bad the article could get. I rooted for a recovery and wanted to see if the writer could come back. I was rooting for the underdog!
Sentence two of the H2 says “Marketers should state what problems the B2B company solves, deliver high-quality content, and include a clear call-to-action.” Ok, this is earth-shattering. Who would ever figure this out? Where has the highly inciteful information been hidden?  
It did cross my mind that the H2 was actually the 3 promised tips that the title offered. I think the writer might want to take notice to his own written words which were “deliver high-quality content”. He should also stay on topic or get a copy editor.
At this point, you may be wondering if the writer that authored the piece is an idiot or if maybe I am an arrogant jerk with a bone to pick with him. Here is the full disclosure; I have never heard of him before reading this piece, I have no ax to grind. I could be a jerk though.  
I do have an agenda, which is to have those content providers actually think about what they are writing and to actually have it reviewed and copy edited before publishing. Follow industry best practices. Stop writing to hit word counts. Stop writing for 8-year old’s and write for grownups! Read your written words, out loud, to hear how it sounds.
Finally, after making it to the body here is how sentence one reads: “All of these suggestions, though, are of little use if the B2B marketer suffers from low traffic volume to their site.”
What? Are you kidding me? The title was nothing more than clickbait?   
I assumed that the author would share something of value. I thought he was going to tell me how to increase traffic? Instead, he basically told that his article was only good if you already had sufficient traffic, but you wanted more traffic. In fact, the author implied (via the title) that he was going to “supply me with three ways to drive more traffic” to my site.  
Nowhere was there an asterisk telling me that I should only read the blog if I have a lot of traffic but need more. At this point, I barely could finish the post. I just skimmed over it and if I didn’t do that my post that you are reading now would have been a couple of thousand words longer.  
I wrote in my opening that mediocrity and drivel are being passed off as high-quality content by marketing bloggers. This statement was made with a broad brush, one that sounded like it was being applied to all bloggers. I didn’t mean to knock or take shots at all marketers or bloggers. There are extremely talented folks who are real wordsmiths that pass on solid content and provide a real service to the industry.
Writers and marketers like Maddy Osman of The Blogsmith or Neil Patel, an entrepreneur, marketing genius, content writer, or Jeff Bullas who has an excellent blog and whom all deliver excellent content!
The time I spend reading their work is an investment on my part, that investment pays dividends helping me to stay sharp. I learn from them and many other excellent bloggers.  
Unfortunately, the marketing blogs that I am finding on LinkedIn and now Zest and other places are starting to add up to a pile of crap which is being passed off as good content!
If you would like to read the article in its own home environment here is the URL.
I would be more than happy to hear from you folks with your thoughts.  Please, don't hesitate to drop me a note, good or bad, or maybe just comment in the comment section where it is appropriate!  Remember, be honest and thoughtful.  People that are reading blogs and articles, etc., are looking for information, not word counts, click bait titles. Check out our company’s blogs. If I am being a hypocrite drop me a note and let me know.

P.S. I wrote this a month ago, but I am sending it out today because I STILL think it is relevant!!



Yam Regev said…

That's a terrible thing to hear and a huge bummer for us, Mike.

Zest's multi-level, human-based content moderation structure is built just for that kill.

Meaning, we've structured it in this way that a few marketing pros read and approve articles before they get published.

Only the most in-depth, insightful and added-value content should be published on Zest.

Although we've just launched a few months ago, we grew quite fast but as you can see some bad content with 0 added value is sometimes finding its way to the feed :(

Two pragmatic things:
1. I have removed this article from our feed + database.

2. I'd love to have you as a Scouter. Scouters are sharp-eyed pro marketers who scout through the feed for content that shouldn’t be there.

Thanks for your constructive feedback, good man :)

Yam Regev
Co-Founder, CEO & CMO

Popular posts from this blog

AHREFS tops the marketing blunder list of 2018

It’s Early in 2018 and AHREFS tops the marketing blunder list It’s only the first week in February and you are reading about the Metrics/Data supplier that has provided us with fodder by creating a huge marketing blunder, Ahrefs.

Ahrefs is world's biggest third-party database of search queries with refined monthly search volume and research metrics.  Their data is used by untold numbers of digital marketers across the world.  Arguably they are the industry leader in this type of data.  The only thing that they changed was how a tiny item in their metrics was being calculated. 
About a week prior to the effective date of the change, Ahrefs notified users that a change was coming to how they calculated a domain rating or DR.  They also stated that many sites would see their rankings drop.  I agree that a need for change was warranted.  What I don’t agree with how they calculated the change and its ramifications for roughly 75% of all websites.  

This past Friday evening around 11 P.…

Hello March!

It is finally March! What will be your marketing strategy for this new month?!

The Wonders of the Weekend

How are you enjoying your first weekend of march?! Are you spending time working on your marketing plans or are you taking some time for yourself & enjoying the company of your family & friends? If you are working over the weekend, take a read at some of our older blog posts and give us some feedback. We are always looking for ways to improve the content we push out to our loyal readers.