Skip to main content

The ROI of Website Redesigns per Forrester


Forrester Research makes a collection of its past webcasts on various online marketing topics freely available (registration required). I recently checked out one of their presentations from about a year ago titled "The ROI of Web Site Redesigns Made Simple" by Harley Manning and Jeffrey North. Like any presentation from one of the big analyst firms, the research focuses on very large companies, and is vertically unfocused (in this webcast, they divided websites into three groups: e-commerce, manufacturing [including B2B] and financial services), but still provides some nuggets of value for smaller organizations.

Forrester's key findings from their website redesign research:
  • By Forrester's standards, 97% of business websites fail to earn a passing grade for usability. Among the biggest sins—79% fail at basic legibility (adequate font size and contrast with background). They cite the New York Times website as the gold standard for legibility (not logic, truth or common sense mind you, just legibility).

  • It's almost impossible not to get positive ROI from a competent website redesign project.

  • The top goals in website redesign projects were to provide more and better information, increase leads/sales, improve customer service, and build brand loyalty. Participants in Forrester's study for the most part thought they had achieved these goals, although building brand loyalty was the most difficult to measure: 28% of respondents had no idea whether or not they had accomplished this.

ROI results

Results varied across the three broad vertical groups, with e-commerce sites not surprisingly achieving the highest ROI from site redesign projects. All groups benefited from the effort, however. For B2B websites:
  • Among the companies Forrester studied, site traffic increased anywhere from 0-15%. Traffic increases were driven by two factors: improved SEO to drive new traffic, and increased repeat visits (due to having better content on the site).

  • The conversion rate (of visitors to leads) increased by 20-50%, from an average of 1.5% to somewhere in the range of 1.8-2.25%.

  • Service calls were reduced—through deflection from phone to web—by 10-20%.

  • Total ROI varied from 70% to 500%.

  • While larger redesign projects produced a higher return in dollars, smaller projects produced a higher percentage return—at lower cost and lower risk.

How to keep costs down
  • Use interactivity and integration with back-end systems (e.g. lead collection straight into a CRM application) wisely; this is a major cost driver.

  • Limit the number of approvers involved and the number of review cycles.

  • Use high-production value assets such as Flash and online video sparingly.

  • Target only as many unique customer segments as you really need to.

  • Re-use as much existing content as possible.

  • Limit use of personalization—while this is pretty much required for e-commerce sites, it's less crucial for B2B sites (though it can be very helpful in the customer service area).

How to generate positive ROI
  • Start with an understanding of your unique target customer segments and their information needs (the approach KCA has always taken—nice to get validation).

  • Develop metrics for measuring ROI so you can get an accurate "before" and "after" picture. These include new site visits (SEO-driven), repeat visits, conversion rate and service call deflection rate.

  • Develop a schedule and stick to it, avoiding scope creep.

  • Content is king; visitors will be attracted to your site, and ultimately to doing business with you, based on quality and relevance of your site content.

  • Involve customer service staff intimately. No one knows how to reduce support calls by providing and making it easy to find common answers than this group. Also make sure sales is involved—they (should) know better than anyone else what information your prospects want, as opposed to simply what you want to say.

Finally, how do you know if you need a site redesign? If your current site design is more than four years old—you need one. At three-four years old, it may be okay but is worth a review. If your existing site is less than three years old, it shouldn't need a complete makeover, but still may benefit from a face-lift and content refresh.

Again, you can check out Forrester's free webcasts for yourself here.

*****


Contact Mike Bannan: mike@digitalrdm.com

Comments

Terra Andersen said…
This is all very true.. as I tell my clients most of these things very often. Good find!

-Terra
www.BetterForBusiness.com

Popular posts from this blog

AHREFS tops the marketing blunder list of 2018

It’s Early in 2018 and AHREFS tops the marketing blunder list It’s only the first week in February and you are reading about the Metrics/Data supplier that has provided us with fodder by creating a huge marketing blunder, Ahrefs.

Ahrefs is world's biggest third-party database of search queries with refined monthly search volume and research metrics.  Their data is used by untold numbers of digital marketers across the world.  Arguably they are the industry leader in this type of data.  The only thing that they changed was how a tiny item in their metrics was being calculated. 
About a week prior to the effective date of the change, Ahrefs notified users that a change was coming to how they calculated a domain rating or DR.  They also stated that many sites would see their rankings drop.  I agree that a need for change was warranted.  What I don’t agree with how they calculated the change and its ramifications for roughly 75% of all websites.  

This past Friday evening around 11 P.…

Hello March!

It is finally March! What will be your marketing strategy for this new month?!

The Wonders of the Weekend

How are you enjoying your first weekend of march?! Are you spending time working on your marketing plans or are you taking some time for yourself & enjoying the company of your family & friends? If you are working over the weekend, take a read at some of our older blog posts and give us some feedback. We are always looking for ways to improve the content we push out to our loyal readers.